Verify dependency upgrade and smoke integration
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||
# Dependency upgrades, discovery, and smoke testing implementation plan
|
||||
|
||||
Status: Stages 1–17 complete; Stage 18 is next.
|
||||
Status: Stages 1–18 complete.
|
||||
|
||||
## Authority and baseline
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -882,6 +882,17 @@ historical API examples or release notes.
|
||||
**Complete when:** every target below is implemented and evidenced, documentation
|
||||
and dependency metadata agree, and the workspace is clean.
|
||||
|
||||
**Completed:** 2026-10-17. All three module suites passed in the workspace and
|
||||
again with isolated readonly module graphs. The temporary ckconfig and ckprompt
|
||||
module files and sums were unchanged by readonly checks. Module listings select
|
||||
ReleaseKit v0.4.2, ConfigKit v0.8.0, and PromptKit v0.16.0; dependency listings
|
||||
show no optional integration imports in core and no PromptKit imports in
|
||||
ckconfig. All 40 maintained shell examples matched their expected outcomes,
|
||||
including the documented validation failure. Go files were formatted, the full
|
||||
change set contained only roadmap-scoped files and intended APIs, local links
|
||||
and Markdown whitespace passed, and the worktree was clean after commit. No
|
||||
release was tagged, pushed, or published.
|
||||
|
||||
## Target verification checklist
|
||||
|
||||
| Target | Primary stages | Completion evidence |
|
||||
@@ -899,7 +910,6 @@ and dependency metadata agree, and the workspace is clean.
|
||||
| No reverse optional dependencies, obsolete catalog graph, or local upstream replacements | 16, 18 | Independent manifests/module/test-import listings and notices |
|
||||
| Upstream testing ownership respected | All testing stages | Assertions address CommandKit interfaces and coordination, not native domain correctness |
|
||||
|
||||
No product or API question requires a separate decision before these stages
|
||||
can begin. Concrete presentation and wiring choices above stay within the
|
||||
accepted roadmap; implementation should not elevate incidental details into
|
||||
additional guarantees.
|
||||
No separate product or API decision was needed to complete the stages. Concrete
|
||||
presentation and wiring choices stayed within the accepted roadmap; incidental
|
||||
implementation details were not elevated into additional guarantees.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user