Identify the protected alias affected by a proposed edit

docs/roadmap/remediation.md

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
 **Updated:** 2026-11-11
 
-**Status:** 8 of nine findings resolved. Findings refer to implementation revision
+**Status:** All nine findings resolved. Findings refer to implementation revision
 `aa8073c`. See the [implementation plan](implementation.md).
 
 ## Review Result
@@ -295,6 +295,8 @@ of identity loss over capitalization and the existing rejection rules.
 
 ### R9 — Name the Affected Protected Alias (P3)
 
+**Completed.** Protection feedback identifies a spelling whose occurrence count fell. The alias regression and existing spoken-word protection tests pass.
+
 **Affected plan:** Stage 5, item 4.
 
 **Evidence:** When an identity loses a mention, the
@@ -352,6 +354,6 @@ the unchanged spelling.
 - Fresh tests passed for runner, validators, process reporting, LLM adapter,
   preflight, response schemas, proposal generation, configuration, and prompts
   during the algorithmic audit.
-
-Resolve the findings with focused checks at their owning boundaries. Retain the
-current architecture and accepted operator choices.
+- After remediation, the fresh full test suite, targeted race checks for the
+  runner, validators, process reporting, LLM adapter, and CLI, and the CLI build
+  passed.