Record intentional editorial acceptance across modules

This commit is contained in:
2026-11-11 14:19:06 +00:00
parent ca36c3e319
commit 64e5d0d275
5 changed files with 92 additions and 22 deletions

View File

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
**Base Policy Version:** 1.3
**Last Updated**: 2026-09-28
**Last Updated**: 2026-11-11
**Upstream Source:** [Standard Repository Policies architecture](https://gitea.maximumdirect.net/eric/policy/src/commit/d84a38ebab26f048cafbe59a2246700c35d29843/docs/policy/architecture.md)
## Purpose And Ownership
@@ -72,6 +72,12 @@ hidden global state.
## Correction and Concurrency Invariants
- Module focus guides proposal generation; it is not an exclusive acceptance
boundary. Validators permit otherwise acceptable minor editorial cleanup even
when the originating module did not request it. Existing applicability,
protection, and meaning checks still apply. See
[ADR 0003](../adr/0003-module-focus-and-editorial-acceptance.md) for the empirical
rationale and rejected strict-scope alternative.
- Treat LLM responses as nondeterministic inputs. Preserve deterministic proposal
indexing, validator ordering, transcript mutation, reports, and serialization.
- Validate corrections before final mutation, including local proposal checks,