Record intentional editorial acceptance across modules

docs/internal/prompts.md

@@ -17,6 +17,13 @@ supplies the embedded instruction fragments for those names. Processing supplies
 Audita's response-schema contract separately.
 The operator's prompt definition controls which variables its template uses.
 
+Proposal focus and validator acceptance intentionally differ: minor editorial
+cleanup may be accepted even when the proposing module was not asked to perform
+it. Follow the [architecture boundary](../policy/architecture.md#correction-and-concurrency-invariants)
+when maintaining proposal, validation, and repair instructions; the difference
+alone is not a reason to tighten validation. The testing rationale is recorded in
+[ADR 0003](../adr/0003-module-focus-and-editorial-acceptance.md).
+
 For a standard request preview or validation, select a native PromptKit profile
 and supply the template variables used by the selected prompt. The shipped
 proposal definitions use `TranscriptDescriptionBlock`, `GlossaryJSON`,