Clarify requirements flag repetition
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||
# PromptKit requirements inspection review
|
||||
|
||||
Status: three open findings. This document records required follow-up work;
|
||||
Status: R-1 completed; R-2 and R-3 open. This document records follow-up work;
|
||||
the review does not change implementation or current contracts.
|
||||
|
||||
## Review scope and authority
|
||||
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ presentation beyond the selected contract.
|
||||
|
||||
## R-1: Correct singleton wording for requirements flags
|
||||
|
||||
Status: open. Priority: normal. Category: documentation contract.
|
||||
Status: completed. Priority: normal. Category: documentation contract.
|
||||
|
||||
**Evidence:** [CLI reference](../cli.md), lines 418–420, says that the built-in
|
||||
flags are singleton bindings and that the last value is used when repeated.
|
||||
@@ -49,6 +49,12 @@ change is required.
|
||||
its flag table and prose. Check the wording against the existing assignment and
|
||||
singleton coverage; new generic parser tests are unnecessary.
|
||||
|
||||
**Completed:** Qualified the CLI singleton statement to exclude `--var`, retaining
|
||||
the existing per-key replacement and selector-binding descriptions. Reviewed the
|
||||
wording against `newRequirementsCommand` and the existing request/assignment
|
||||
coverage. Local links/fragments and `git diff --check` passed. No parser, handler,
|
||||
or test changes were needed.
|
||||
|
||||
## R-2: Complete the canonical requirements YAML schema
|
||||
|
||||
Status: open. Priority: normal. Category: incomplete documentation delivery.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user